Frontal myectomy: An alternative to reduce frontal wrinkles

  • Fausto Viterbo Departamento de Cirugía Plástica, Universidad Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
  • Charles Nduka Consultor Queen Victoria Hospital
  • Ryane S. Brock Universidade Estadual Paulista, Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones de Defectos de la Cara
Keywords: frontal rhytidectomy, facial wrinkles, myectomy

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Cutaneous, subcutaneous and bony changes are characteristic of the aging face over time. Loss of soft tissue elasticity, volumetric changes and facial muscle activity are largely responsible for facial wrinkles and their treatment is the most frequent request of patients seeking facial rejuvenation. The aim of this study is to describe an alternative surgical technique to treat frontal wrinkles with less morbidity and longer lasting results. Material and method: We collected a total of 31 patients between 37 and 75 years of age who underwent frontal myectomy between 2003 and 2007. The incision was divided over the upper eyelid, precapillary and transcapillary. Results: Postoperative recovery time was short, with oedema around 5–7 days; they returned to normal activities within 7 days. No patient had intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The treatment of horizontal forehead wrinkles with frontal myectomy is a fast, minimally invasive procedure that offers a satisfactory result.

References

Marino H, Gandolfo E. Tratamiento para arrugas de la frente (Spanish) [Treatment for forehead wrinkles]. Prensa Med Argent 1964; 51: 1368–1371.

Pitanguy I. Indications for and treatment of frontal and glabellar wrinkles in an analysis of 3,404 consecutive cases of rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 67(2): 157–168.

Keen M, Blitzer A, Aviv J, Binder W, Prystowsky J, et al. Botulinum toxin A for hyperkinetic facial lines: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94(1): 94–99.

Vasconez LO, Core GB, Gamboa-Bobadilla M, Guzman G, Askren C, et al. Endoscopic techniques in coronal brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94(6):788–793.

Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97(7): 1321–1333.

Viterbo F. Lifting frontal sub-cutaneous with frontal myectomy. 18ª Jornada Sul - Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica; 2002.

Guyuron B, Knize DM. Corrugator supercilii resection through blepharoplasty incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107(2): 606–607.

Zide BM, Swift R. How to block and tackle the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101(3): 840–851.

Graziosi AC, Beer SMC. Browlifting with thread: The technique without undermining using minimum incisions. Aesth Plast Surg 1998; 22(2): 120–125.

Isse NG. Endoscopic facial rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1997; 24(2): 213–231.

Day C, Nahai F. Forehead correction of aging. In: Mathes SJ (editor). Plastic Surgery Plastic surgery: The head and neck. Part 1. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. p. 47–76.

Knize DM. Anatomic concepts for brow lift procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2118–2126.

Bastidas N, Zide B. Suspension of the brow in facial paralysis and frontalis loss. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126(2): 486–488.

Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108(6): 1735–1750.

Carruthers JDA, Glogau RG, Blitzer A. Advances in facial rejuvenation: Botulinum toxin type A, hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, and combination therapies–Consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121(5S): 5S–30S.

Vinas JC, Caviglia C, Cortinas JL. Forehead rhytidoplasty and brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976 57(4): 445–454.

Published
2023-05-24
Section
Original Research Articles