Tear trough – Anatomy and treatment by autologous fat grafting
Abstract
Tear trough is the main irregularity at midface, of which treatment is difficult. There is no agreement in literature about its anatomy and best treatment. The author presented an anatomical study and personal autologous fat grafting technique for tear trough treatment. Anatomical dissections were done on two fresh cadavers to examine the skin, subcutaneous, muscle and bone layers, spaces, and attachments. Safety and efficacy were evaluated via retrospective analysis of the last 200 consecutive procedures performed by the author. Tear trough is caused by the abrupt transition of the palpebral orbicular oculi muscle (OOM) (i.e., thin skin without subcutaneous fat compartment) to the orbital OOM (i.e., thicker skin with malar fat compartment). The tear trough region is located at the OOM bony origin at the medial canthus where no specific ligament was found. The grafted fat volume stabilized at two or three months after the procedure, instead of six months as stated in literature, with excellent results and no severe complications. Tear trough is a personal characteristic, a natural anatomical depression caused by subcutaneous irregularity and can worsen with age. The lack of volume is not effectively corrected by surgeries and thus it must be filled. Fat grafting has several advantages over alloplastic fillers, although it may be more difficult. Fat graft is autologous and abundant, and tissue transplantation could enhance skin quality. Fat grafting is a simple, safe, and effective solution for adding extra volume to correct the deflation phenomenon of the midface aging process. There is no specific anatomical plane for volume injection; the fat graft must be evenly distributed in the deep and superficial plane for uniformity.
References
Goldberg RA. The three periorbital hollows: A paradigm for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116(6): 1796–1804. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.000018562 3.367 95.38.
Pessa JE, Desvigne LD, Lambros VS, Nimerick J, Sug-unan B, et al. Changes in ocular globe-to-orbital rim po-sition with age: Implications for aesthetic blepharoplasty of the lower eyelids. Aesth Plast Surg 1999; 23(5): 337– 342. doi: 10.1007/s002669900295.
Donofrio LM. Fat distribution: A morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26(12): 1107–1112. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00270.x.
Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(5): 1367–1376. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279348.09156.c3.
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: Anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119(7): 2219–2227. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000265403.66886.54.
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE, Ristow B. The youthful cheek and the deep medial fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121(6): 2107–2112. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318 17123c6.
Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: Verification of Lambros’s theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106(2): 479–488. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200008000-00040.
Pessa JE, Chen Y. Curve analysis of the aging orbital aperture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002: 109(2): 751–760.
Shaw RB Jr, Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony ele-ments: A three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119(2): 675–681. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000246596.79795.a8.
Mendelson BC, Hartley W, Scott M, McNab A, Granzow JW. Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implications for facial rejuvenation. Aesth Plast Surg 2007; 31(5): 419–423. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0120-x.
Yaremchuk MJ, Kahn DM. Periorbital skeletal augmenta-tion to improve blepharoplasty and midfacial results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2151–2160. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bcf5bc.
Hirmand H. Anatomy and nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125(2): 699–708. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82f90.
Yaremchuk MJ. Infraorbital rim augmentation. Plast Re-constr Surg 2001; 107(6): 1585–1592. doi: 10.1097/0000 6534-200105000-00047.
Trepsat F. Periorbital rejuvenation combining fat grafting and blepharoplasties. Aesth Plast Surg 2003; 27(4): 243–253. doi: 10.1007/s00266-003-2126-y.
Trepsat F. Lipostructure du tiers moyen du visage (French) [Midface reshaping with micro-fat grafting]. Ann Chir Plast Esth 2009; 54(5): 435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.20 09.03.008.
Haddock NT, Saadeh PB, Boutros S, Thorne CH. The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: Anatomy and implications for surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123(4): 1332–1340. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819f2b36.
Pessa JE. Discussion: The tear trough and lid/cheek junc-tion: Anatomy and implication for surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123(4): 1341–1342. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819f25ec.
Yang N, Qiu W, Wang Z, Su X, Jia H, et al. (Chinese) [Anatomical studying of the tear trough area]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014; 30(1): 50–53.
Yang C, Zhang PP, Li JH, Xing X. (Chinese) [Anatomic study on the mechanism of tear trough deformity and palpbromalar groove deformity]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010; 26(2): 139–142.
Rosenfield LK. The pinch blepharoplasty revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115(5): 1404–1412. doi: 10.1097/0 1.PRS.0000157020.67216.31.
Wong CH, Hsieh MKH, Mendelson B. The tear trough ligament: Anatomical basis for the tear trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129(6): 1392–1402. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecd77.
Pessa JE. Discussion: The tear trough ligament: Anatom-ical basis for the tear trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129(6): 1403–1404. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e 3182507a08.
Youn S, Shin JI, Kim JT, Kim YH. Transconjunctival subperiosteal fat reposition for tear trough deformity: Pedicled fat redraping versus septal reset. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73(5): 479–484. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318 27f5455.
Hill RH 3rd, Czyz CN, Kandapalli S, Zhang-Nunes SX, Cahill KV, et al. Evolving minimally invasive techniques for tear trough enhancement. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 31(4): 306–309. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000 325.
Chang YC, Rovaris DA. Lipoenxertia autóloga perior-bitária no rejuvenescimento facial: Análise retrospectiva da eficácia e segurança em 31 casos (Portuguese) [Auto-logous periorbital fat grafting in facial rejuvenation: A retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in 31 cases]. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2012; 27(3): 405–410. doi: 10.1590/S 1983-51752012000300013.
Majollal A, Lequeux C, Shipkov C, Breton P, Foyatier JL, et al. Improvement of skin quality after fat grafting: Clinical observation and an animal study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(3): 765–774. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31 81b17b8f.
Covarrubias P, Cárdenas-Camarena L, Guerrerosanto J, Valenzuela L, Espejo I, et al. Evaluation of the histologic changes in the fat-grafted facial skin: Clinical trial. Aesth Plast Surg 2013; 37(4): 778–783. doi: 10.1007/s00266-01 3-0126-0.
Gir P, Brown AS, Oni G, Kashefi N, Mojallal A, et al. Fat grafting: Evidence-based review on autologous fat har-vesting, processing, reinjection, and storage. Plast Recons-tr Surg 2012; 130(1): 249–258. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013 e318254b4d3.
Rochrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA. In search of im-proved fat transfer viability: A quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113(1): 391–395. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.00000 97293.56504.00.
Mailey B, Saba S, Baker J, Tokin C, Hickey S, et al. A comparison of cell-enriched fat transfer to conventional fat grafting after aesthetic procedures using a patient sat-isfaction survey. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70(4): 410–415. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827e5353.
Sagarello M, Visconti G, Rusciani A. Breast fat grafting with platelet-rich plasma: A comparative clinical study and current state of the art. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127(6): 2176–2185. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182139f e7.
Kim SM, Kim YS, Hong JW, Roh TS, Rah DK. An anal-ysis of the experiences of 62 patients with moderate complications after full-face fat injection for augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129(6): 1359–1368. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecbb0.
Grahovac TL, Rubin JP. Discussion: An analysis of the experiences of 62 patients with moderate complications after full-face fat injection for augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129(6): 1369–1370. doi: 10.1097/PRS. 0b013e31824f4ffc.
Copyright (c) 2016 Chang YC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit and that the work is not used for commercial purposes. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
